Download Transformational Grammar: A First Course (Cambridge by Andrew Radford PDF

By Andrew Radford

Radford's new textbook is essentially for college kids with very little heritage in syntax who desire a full of life and up to date creation to modern paintings on transformational grammar. It covers 4 major subject matters: the targets of linguistic thought, syntactic constitution, the character and function of the lexicon, and the functionality and operations of differences. the final framework considers significant works, equivalent to Chomsky's wisdom of Language and limitations , written because the booklet of Radford's greatly acclaimed Transformational Syntax in 1981. the current ebook makes use of a more moderen theoretical development and likewise covers a much wider variety of frameworks on the descriptive point than its predecessor. Radford is celebrated for his powerful instructing techniques and this present quantity demonstrates his expertise by way of giving a concise, non-technical creation to the sector. At every one chapter's finish are routines that toughen the textual content, permitting scholars to use some of the suggestions mentioned and inspiring them to appear extra seriously at a number of the assumptions and analyses awarded. Radford presents an invaluable, particular bibliography of basic resource fabric.

Show description

Read or Download Transformational Grammar: A First Course (Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics) PDF

Similar grammar books

Mapping spatial PPS : the cartography of syntactic structures

Mapping Spatial PPs specializes in a selected point of the inner syntax of prepositional words that has been really overlooked in prior reports: the fine-grained articulation in their constitution. With contributions from most sensible students within the box, this quantity investigates such parts as course, position, axial half, deictic middle, absolute (ambiental) and relative view element, utilizing facts from Romance, Germanic, and African languages, with references to different language households.

Mapping the Left Periphery: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Volume 5

Mapping the Left outer edge, the 5th quantity in "The Cartography of Syntactic Structures," is fullyyt dedicated to the sensible articulation of the so-called complementizer process, the top a part of sentence constitution. The papers gathered the following determine, at the foundation of considerable empirical facts, new atoms of practical constitution, which encode particular gains which are commonly expressed within the left outer edge.

Endocentric structuring of projection-free syntax

Endocentric Structuring of Projection-free Syntax places ahead a singular conception of syntax that rigidly adheres to the main of minimum Computation, during which a few conventional yet extraneous conditions akin to referential indices and representational labels/projections are eradicated. It in particular articulates the overarching speculation that each syntactic item consists by way of recursive, phase-by-phase embedding of the endocentric constitution {H, α}, the place H is a head lexical merchandise and α is one other syntactic item (order irrelevant).

Additional resources for Transformational Grammar: A First Course (Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics)

Sample text

WH ] in (i) should undergo wh-movement. Due to PF-reasons, it cannot strand the phonological features (i-a). Moreover, who cannot be separated from the D-head ’s, which cliticizes to it (i-b). At least the D-head must be pied-piped by who. But who and the D-head do not form a constituent (i-c); thus the complete DP undergoes pied-piping (i-d). 39. Similarly, Merchant (2001, 161, footnote 1) argues that if pied-piping were due to PFrequirements, then it should be suspended if these are vacuously satisfied.

4. Webelhuth (1992) Webelhuth (1992) proposes yet another pied-piping theory that is based on wh-feature percolation. He develops his analysis on the basis of pied-piping facts from several Germanic languages. 30 (37) a. A modifier is not a pied-piper. b. A specifier is a pied-piper. c. A complement is not a pied-piper. He then sets out to derive these generalizations from more basic principles of the grammar. I confine myself to the presentation of the core ideas, thereby avoiding technical details.

B. *Egbert knows [ PP of which of his former girl-friends ] 3 [ DP the father t3 ] 2 t2 criticized him. c. *Egbert knows [ DP which of his former girl-friends ] 4 [ DP the father of t4 ]2 t2 criticized him. Pied-piping of DP2 in (52-a) is impossible, irrespective of the fact that movement of PP3 and DP4 is also blocked (DP2 forms a subject island). The economy condition on generalized pied-piping cannot account for this and therefore Lutz and Trissler’s (1997) theory requires additional restrictions.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.60 of 5 – based on 27 votes