Download Constituent Structure by Andrew Carnie PDF

By Andrew Carnie

This booklet explores the empirical and theoretical facets of constituent constitution in normal language syntax. It surveys a wide selection of functionalist and formalist theoretical ways, from dependency grammars and Relational Grammar to Lexical useful Grammar, Head-driven word constitution Grammar, and Minimalism. It describes the normal exams for constituency and the formal ability for representing them in word constitution grammars, prolonged word constitution grammars, X-bar thought, and set theoretic naked word constitution. In doing so it presents a transparent, thorough, and rigorous axiomatic description of the structural homes of constituent bushes. Andrew Carnie considers the imperative controversies on constituent constitution. Is it, for instance, a primitive suggestion or should still or not it's derived from relational or semantic shape? Do sentences have a unmarried constituency or a number of constituencies? Does constituency function on unmarried or a number of dimensions? And what precisely is the categorial content material of constituent constitution representations? He identifies issues of commonality in addition to vital theoretical transformations one of the a number of techniques to constituency, and severely examines the strengths and obstacles of competing frameworks. This re-creation comprises textual revisions in addition to a brand new ultimate bankruptcy and guarantees that Constituent Structure is still the definitive advisor to constituency for complicated undergraduates and graduate scholars, in addition to theoretical linguists of all persuasions in departments of linguistics, cognitive technology, computational technological know-how, and comparable fields.

Show description

Read Online or Download Constituent Structure PDF

Best grammar books

Mapping spatial PPS : the cartography of syntactic structures

Mapping Spatial PPs makes a speciality of a selected point of the interior syntax of prepositional words that has been rather missed in earlier stories: the fine-grained articulation in their constitution. With contributions from best students within the box, this quantity investigates such parts as course, place, axial half, deictic middle, absolute (ambiental) and relative view aspect, utilizing facts from Romance, Germanic, and African languages, with references to different language households.

Mapping the Left Periphery: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Volume 5

Mapping the Left outer edge, the 5th quantity in "The Cartography of Syntactic Structures," is totally dedicated to the practical articulation of the so-called complementizer approach, the top a part of sentence constitution. The papers accrued right here determine, at the foundation of considerable empirical facts, new atoms of sensible constitution, which encode particular positive factors which are in general expressed within the left outer edge.

Endocentric structuring of projection-free syntax

Endocentric Structuring of Projection-free Syntax places ahead a singular conception of syntax that rigidly adheres to the main of minimum Computation, within which a few conventional yet extraneous conditions corresponding to referential indices and representational labels/projections are eradicated. It in particular articulates the overarching speculation that each syntactic item consists by way of recursive, phase-by-phase embedding of the endocentric constitution {H, α}, the place H is a head lexical merchandise and α is one other syntactic item (order irrelevant).

Extra info for Constituent Structure

Sample text

19 One possible solution is to simply deWne dominance as uninterrupted sequences of immediate dominance relations (essentially axiom A3, using immediate dominance, rather than the dominance relation). Such a characterization, however, runs afoul of axiom A1, where dominance is deWned as reXexive. Since, from a set-theoretic perspective, the edge set cannot contain pairs of the form hx, xi, we will never be able to capture the reXexive character of dominance using graph-theoretic terms. I leave this problem aside here.

Accounting for these facts is easy if one takes a hierarchical approach to combinatorics. The focus of this book is on capturing the nature, mechanics, and forms of both ‘‘closeness’’ relationships and relationships that are more distant like the agreement facts in (10). 3 Thanks to Massimo Piatelli Palmarini for pointing out these examples to me. 2 Regular grammars It is worth brieXy discussing the long tradition in linguistics and psychology of treating sentence structure as a kind of concatenation similar to that we rejected above.

From this we were allowed to conclude that not only is the man a constituent it is a constituent of the same type as John. But this free substitution operation frequently gives false results (as pointed out to me by Dave Medeiros). For example, given the adverb really in John really stinks, we can substitute the non-constituent, non-adverb string thinks that the Wsh. For this reason we limit replacement to pronominal replacement with the additional proviso that there has to be some (vaguely deWned) similarity in meaning between the replaced item and its replacement.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.19 of 5 – based on 41 votes